First defect
Free
One measured finding on one site. No obligation, no follow-up sequence.
Start here — it's free
Send me a URL. I'll find you one real defect.
Not a PDF of generic advice. One specific, measured thing that is wrong with your site right now, with the measurement attached, so you can hand it straight to a developer. It takes me about twenty minutes. There is no pitch on the end of it and no obligation — if you never write back, that's a perfectly good outcome.
One per site. If I look and find nothing worth reporting, I'll tell you that instead, which is also useful information.
agentforgepro@gmail.comWhat I audit
AI-search visibility
Whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google's AI answers and Claude can actually reach, read and cite
your site. This is not a rebrand of SEO. It covers crawler access at the CDN and in robots.txt,
whether your llms.txt says anything about your business or is platform boilerplate,
structured data coverage and entity completeness, canonical and indexation errors that hide your
conversion pages, and what a non-rendering crawler actually sees when JavaScript is off.
Accessibility, WCAG 2.2 AA
Tested with axe-core against WCAG 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2 at levels A and AA, in a real browser at real viewport sizes with every stylesheet loaded — so colour contrast is measured from computed styles, not estimated from a palette. Supplemented by raw-HTML inspection, landmark and heading structure, form labelling, and a JavaScript-disabled render test.
What I don't sell: legal opinions, ADA or European Accessibility Act risk assessments, VPATs, attestations or compliance certificates. Those are a lawyer's work, not mine. You get findings for your review.
What it costs
AI-visibility audit
from $160
Crawler access, structured data, canonicals, machine-readable description, prioritised fixes.
Accessibility audit
from $140
axe-core against WCAG 2.2 AA, every instance located, ranked by impact.
Price depends on how many pages and templates need covering. Larger catalogues and multi-template sites land higher in the range. Remediation — actually applying the fixes and re-testing against the deployed build — is quoted separately once we both know what is wrong.
Published audits
startovar.com — WCAG 2.2 AA and AI-visibility audit, then remediation
A Next.js marketplace on Cloudflare Workers. Seven pages audited, fixed, then re-audited against the deployed build to prove the fixes actually shipped.
39 → 9
violation instances, before and after
30
contrast failures cleared, one root cause
1
dramatic finding measured and withdrawn
The two most valuable findings were not accessibility defects. The signup and login pages both declared the homepage as their canonical URL, telling Google the conversion page was a duplicate. And robots.txt was blocking GPTBot, ClaudeBot and CCBot while the site's own llms.txt invited them in.
Disclosed in full: startovar.com is my own property, audited to the same standard I apply to client work. Read the audit and judge the method, not the relationship.
Every audit I publish goes up whether it flatters the site or not, dated, with the tool versions and the raw measurements included.
How the work is produced
Detection is deterministic and reproducible: axe-core, a crawl, schema extraction, robots and sitemap parsing, response-header checks, computed styles read from a real browser. Run it twice and you get the same numbers. Triage and the writing are AI-assisted, and reviewed by me before anything reaches you.
Nothing is published or sent to a client without my review. I am personally responsible for every claim in every report I sign.